Lawsuits are complex journeys that can stretch over months or years, involving multiple phases, complex legal strategies, significant expenses and difficult decisions for both plaintiffs and defendants. This article walks through the process of a lawsuit from its inception to judgment enforcement, with a focus on the challenges of collecting from sophisticated defendants who have robust asset protection measures in place. Along the way, we’ll explore how these protections influence negotiations and the legal strategies employed by both sides.
1. The Complaint: Filing a Lawsuit
Every lawsuit begins with identifying a claim—whether it’s a breach of contract, negligence, or another actionable cause. Once the claim is identified, the plaintiff drafts and files a complaint, laying out the allegations and the desired relief. The next step is to serve the complaint to the defendant, officially notifying them of the lawsuit.
The defendant’s response is called an answer and can take several forms. They may admit or deny the allegations, file a motion to dismiss the case entirely, or even counter-sue the plaintiff.
Right from the beginning, both sides are assessing their positions. The plaintiff considers whether both the strength of their case as well as if the defendant has assets and/or insurance that can satisfy a judgment, while the defendant evaluates their defenses or counter claims as well as their exposure to liability and the strengths and vulnerabilities of their asset protection measures.
2. The Discovery Process: Unearthing the Truth
The discovery phase is where the real work begins. Both sides exchange information to build their cases. This can include depositions (sworn testimonies), interrogatories (written questions), requests for documents, and admissions of fact.
For plaintiffs, this phase is critical in uncovering the defendant’s strengths and weaknesses. They are looking for the "smoking gun" that seals the deal on their case. They are also assessing the collectability of the defendant at the same time. Is there insurance that covers the claim, and how much? Does the defendant have assets, and if so how accessible are those assets should they succeed in winning a judgement?
This is the first time that the defendant may begin to trickle out information about legal structures and protections in place like LLCs, companies and trusts which may may collection difficult. Defendants may also use the fact that these structures represent separate legal entities to shield information in order to frustrate a plaintiff. Plaintiffs may need to file motions to compel the release of information, while defendants might seek protective orders to limit disclosure. Discovery itself may take many months or even years to complete, which often works in favor of the defendant.
3. Settlement Negotiations: Avoiding Trial
Settlement negotiations usually start right from the beginning and continue well into the discovery process. As the parties get a clearer understanding of the case’s strengths and weaknesses, they are continually weighing their options.
Sophisticated defendants with robust asset protection structures can use them as leverage in these talks. By making it clear that collecting a judgment will be extremely difficult, they may successfully push for a lower settlement. Plaintiffs, recognizing the cost and uncertainty of enforcement, may agree to a smaller payout to avoid a prolonged legal battle. This is especially true if there is insurance involved. Insurance will not typically pay out until the defendant agrees and there is a full settlement negotiated. Plaintiffs are often anxious to get access to the insurance
Mediation or arbitration may also play a role here, as neutral third parties help facilitate a resolution. For both sides, settlement is often about finding a balance between risk and reward.
These negotiations often last all the way up to the start day of a trial, inspiring the term "Settling on the courthouse steps".
4. Trial: The Moment of Truth
If settlement efforts fail, the case moves to trial. This involves pre-trial motions, presentation of evidence, witness testimony, and expert analysis. For plaintiffs, trial offers the opportunity to prove their case and secure a judgment. For defendants, it’s a last chance to avoid liability or minimize damages.
In a civil case, a trial is often much less advantageous to a plaintiff, since the plaintiff's attorneys often charge a higher % of the award in a trial, and costs are often much higher. There is also more risk since there is no guarantee of an outcome. Therefore, there is a big incentive to settle prior to a trial.
The trial, when it occurs, eventually concludes with a verdict, either from a jury or a judge, and the formal entry of judgment. For a successful plaintiff, a verdict may seem like a victory; however, for plaintiffs, winning the case is only half the battle—the real challenge begins with enforcing the judgment.
5. Collecting the Judgment: A New Legal Battle
Enforcing a judgment can be straightforward or exceptionally complicated, especially when the defendant has taken steps to protect their assets. Common enforcement actions include garnishing bank accounts, placing liens on property, and seizing assets. Plaintiffs may also issue subpoenas or schedule depositions, known as debtors exams, with the defendant to investigate how and where assets are held and attempt to discover and potentially reverse any fraudulent transfers.
Sophisticated defendants often employ strategies that make collection difficult, such as:
- Asset Protection Trusts: Shielding assets in domestic or offshore trusts.
- Layered LLCs: Using multiple entities to create legal barriers to collection.
- Offshore Accounts: Holding funds in jurisdictions that don't recognize foreign judgments.
If the defendant has taken aggressive measures, plaintiffs will face more decisions when considering that they may need to pursue secondary legal battles, such as filing fraudulent conveyance claims or attempting to pierce the corporate veil, or otherwise attempt to hold a defendant personally liable.
6. The Feedback Loop: Settlement and Asset Protection
The challenges of collecting a judgment often loop back and reopen settlement negotiations. Sophisticated defendants can use their asset protection measures, once again, as a bargaining tool, offering a lower settlement in exchange for avoiding a prolonged and uncertain collection process. Plaintiffs, weighing the cost of further litigation and the uncertainty of collection, often accept offers made at this stage, particularly once they have already attempted to collect and have thwarted.
Considerations for Both Sides
-
For Plaintiffs:
- Conduct pre-litigation asset investigations to assess the feasibility of collection.
- Budget for the potential costs of enforcement, especially against sophisticated defendants.
- Be prepared for long, complex legal battles in jurisdictions with strict asset protection laws.
-
For Defendants:
- Ensure asset protection measures comply with legal standards to avoid fraudulent conveyance claims.
- Understand that overly aggressive strategies may provoke plaintiffs into challenging transfers, increasing exposure.
- Use asset protection as leverage in settlement negotiations, but be mindful of the risks. Asset protection is not a free pass that guarantees a result, but rather should be seen as a powerful tool to assist in reaching a favorable settlement.
The Bigger Picture
The lifecycle of a lawsuit is rarely straightforward, especially when collection comes into play. For plaintiffs, a judgment is only as valuable as their ability to enforce it. For defendants, robust asset protection can make all the difference—but it must be implemented thoughtfully and timely to withstand scrutiny.
Ultimately, both parties must weigh the risks and rewards at every stage, from complaint to collection. By understanding the process and anticipating challenges, they can make informed decisions that align with their legal and financial goals.
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.